Why const literal class is not a constexpr even if initialized from a constexpr?Good point. I suppose you could remove x. I'm not sure what the point of all this is, though.
Why const literal class is not a constexpr even if initialized from a constexpr?If you add a constexpr copy constructor it seems to work for me. [code] class test{ public: cons...
Bit set function not working correctly?The for loop [b]for (int p = 0, t = 0; t < 5; t++)[/b] doesn't make sense. The looping variable t is...
Unhandled Exception: System.AccessViolationException: Attempted to read or write protected memory. This is...Try unsigned char, maybe you're getting negative values when > 0x79. [code] unsigned char oDataL[0x1...
How come a concept receives 2 template parameters but only one is used?There are two syntaxes involved, both of which ultimately supply the same number of parameters, just...
This user does not accept Private Messages