All, being brief as possible, I’m working on an exercise from C++ Primer Plus Sixth Ed. by Stephen Prata. Chapt 10 Ex 6 for those playing along at home. I wasn’t sure what the exercise was asking. I found someone online who had done the exercises. I thought seeing the program in action, I’d understand the requirement and recreate my own. The program I downloaded works perfectly. My lack of understanding of why is works is my issue. I’m hoping someone here can clear up what I’m not understanding.

MOVE.H

class Move{
private:
double x;
double y;
public:
Move(double a = 0, double b = 0); // sets x, y to a, b

void showmove() const;
Move add(const Move & m) const;
void reset(double a = 0, double b = 0); // resets x,y to a, b
};

MOVE.CPP (there are other class methods that deal with display and reset. I excluded them to conserve space.)
Move::Move(double a, double b)
{ x = a; y = b;}
Move Move::add(const Move & m) const
{
double m_x, m_y;
m_x = this-\>x + m.x;
m_y = this-\>y + m.y;
Move newMove(m_x, m_y);
return newMove;
}

MAIN.CPP (There of other line items for display etc.)
Move move1; //Nothing sent so defaults to (x=0,y=0)per the constructor
Move move2(1.5, 2.5); // constructor set move2 x =1.5 & y=2.5
Move move3(1.5, 2.1); // constructor set move3 x=1.5 & y=2.1
Move move4(move2.add(move3)); // this is where my confusion lies.

When creating move4, I expected the constructor to look for nothing being sent or a combination of 2 doubles. Move2::add returns a reference or address of a newly created Move class called newMove. How does the constructor of move4 know to extract the x and y from newMove of class move2. The program works as expected. Move4 X=3 and Y=4.6. I’m obviously missing something. One of the downsides to learning without a teacher / tutor. Thanks.

Please edit your post and add [code] and [/code] tags around your code to format it/add syntax highlighting.

How does the constructor of move4 know to extract the x and y from newMove of class move2.

move4's construction is invoking the class's copy constructor.

The declaration for a copy constructor would look like:
Move(const Move& other);

If you don't define a copy constructor, the compiler will automatically generate one for you, where it does a "shallow"* copy of each data member of the class.

*This doesn't matter for your case, but when you start to deal with pointers, only the pointer itself will be copied; not the memory it points to.

@Ace Blackwell,

Please learn to use code tags, they make reading and commenting on source code MUCH easier. How to use code tags: http://www.cplusplus.com/articles/jEywvCM9/ There are other tags available. How to use tags: http://www.cplusplus.com/articles/z13hAqkS/ HINT: you can edit your post and add code tags. Some formatting & indentation would not hurt either

You may or may not be aware, but in c++, a number of object methods are attempted to be generated for you without being defined. One of those is the copy constructor. https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/default-methods-in-c-with-examples/

so all that is happening is the result of .add() is a move object, and the default copy constructor creates move 4 from that result.

the default functions are part of the reason you have the rule of 3, 5 and so on; if you have not seen those be sure to look them up soon.